Tuesday, May 28, 2024

๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บโ„ข

๐™ฐ๐™ต๐™ต๐™พ๐š๐™ณ๐™ฐ๐™ฑ๐™ป๐™ด & ๐™ฐ๐™ฒ๐™ฒ๐™ด๐š‚๐š‚๐™ธ๐™ฑ๐™ป๐™ด

HINDU LAWPRACTICE MOCK TESTSUBJECT WISE MCQ

KARTA

                             

  1. Karta of a joint Hindu family is
    (A) Senior most male member of the family
    (B) Junior male member of the family
    (C) A female
    (D) Either (A) or (B)
    (E) Only (C)
  2. Property belonging to a joint family is managed by
    (A) Karta
    (B) A coparcener
    (C) Both (A) and (B)
    (D) Only (A)
    (E) Only (B)
  3. A junior male member can be a karta of a joint family
    (A) Only with the Consent of other coparceners
    (B) Without the consent of other coparceners
    (C) As a matter of right
    (D) Only (A) and not (B) and (C)
    (E) Only (C)
  4. According to Hindu sages
    (A) Only a coparcener can be a karta
    (B) A mother can be a karta if educated
    (C) A female can be a karta but must be the senior most female
    (D) Either (B) or (C)
    (E) Only (A) and not (B) and (C)
  5. Under the Hindu law, a karta of the joint family can alienate the property
    (A) Only for legal necessity
    (B) Only for benefit of estate
    (C) Only for socio-religious activities
    (D) All of the above
    (E) None of the above
  6. Manager as the head of the family as regards spending the income of the family
    (A) Is under an obligation to save economise and invest like a trustee.
    (B) Is to save, economise, and invest like an agent
    (C) Is not under the same obligation to save, economise or invest as an agent or trustee, so long as he spends the income for the purposes of the family.
    (D) Both (A) and (B)
  7. Alienation by the karta without legal necessity or the benefit of estate is
    (A) Valid
    (B) Void
    (C) Voidable at the instance of any coparcener
    (D) Voidable at the instance of the alienee.
  8. Where the manager of a joint Hindu family alienates joint family property, the burden of proof of necessity lies
    (A) On the alienee
    (B) On the alienor
    (C) On the alienor and the alienee both
    (D) Either on the alienor or the alienee depending on the facts or circumstances of the case.
    (E) Neither on the alienee nor on the alienor
  9. Which of the following expenses can be justified for legal necessity
    (A) Cost of litigation in recovering or preserving the estate.
    (B) Maintenance of coparceners and members of their families
    (C) Cost of defending the head of the joint family or any other member against a criminal charge
    (D) Only (A) and (B)
    (E) All of the above
  10. When an alienation is made by the manager without legal necessity but with the consent of all other coparceners, they being all adults, is
    (A) Valid in its entirety.
    (B) Voidable at the instance of coparceners
    (C) Void ab initio
    (D) Void to the extent of the share of other coparceners.
  11. Which of the following transactions are not for the benefit of the estate
    (A) A mortgage of family property for the payment of premium for a lease of another property.
    (B) A mortgage of family property for the purposes of purchasing another property
    (C) Both (A) and (B)
    (D) Neither (A) nor (B)
  12. Manger of a joint family has the power to borrow money for
    (A) Family business purposes
    (B) Family necessity
    (C) Both (A) and (B)
    (D) Either (A) or (B)
    (E) Neither (A) nor (B)
  13. In the event of partition in a joint family, the karta is
    (A) Liable to account for his past dealings with the family property
    (B) Liable to account for assets which ought or might have been received if the family property had been profitably dealt with
    (C) Liable to account for the family property as it exists.
    (D) All the above
    (E) None of the above
  14. Authority of a karta of a joint family to borrow in case of necessity is one, to borrow upon
    (A) Reasonable commercial rate of interest
    (B) Current rate of interest
    (C) Minimum rate of interest
    (D) Either (A) or (B) or (C)
    (E) Only (A) and not (B) and (C)
  15. In which of the following case it was held that ‘karta of a joint Hindu family would always by the senior most male member of the family’.
    (A) Commissioner of Income Tax v. Seth Govind Ram (AIR 1966 SC 24)
    (B) Tribhovan Das Haribhai Tamboli v. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal and Ors. (AIR 1991 SC 1538)
    (C) Union of India v. Shree Ram (AIR 1965 SC 1531)
    (D) John Vallamattom v. Union of India (2003) 6 SCC 611
  16. A female cannot be a karta of a joint family, has been held by the Supreme Court in
    (A) Pannalal Bansilal v. State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 1996 SC 1023)
    (B) Commissioner of Income Tax v. Seth Govind Ram (AIR 1966 SC 24)
    (C) Tribhovan Das Haribhai Tamboli v. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal and Ors. (AIR 1991 SC 1538)
    (D) Union of India v. Shree Ram (AIR 1965 SC 1531)

                               

ANSWER 1A 2A 3A 4D 5D 6C 7C 8A 9E 10A 11C 12E 13C 14A 15B 16B

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!